<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Curse of Knowledge.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/archives/936/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/archives/936</link>
	<description>Arte Et Labore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron - PCF</title>
		<link>http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/archives/936/comment-page-1#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron - PCF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/?p=936#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I consider this my one marketable and valuable skill.  Everything else I do in my life can easily be done by hundreds of other people, many of them better than me.  But I am much better at seeing an issue/argument from someone elses&#039; perspective, explaining that issue/argument to them in a way that will allow it to make sense to them given their perspective, and then relating that issue/argument to other things they may not see as remotely connected.  Unfortunately, since I graduated college, I have not been able to utilize this skill in any way that is monetarily useful.  

I need there to be a job in which I translate people&#039;s arguments to one another in a way that prevents what happens in most argumentative conflict which is two sides repeating what they think ... like two ships passing in the night.

What job is that?  It&#039;s not advertising.  That&#039;s just sloganeering.  Probably not politics since that is often more like advertising.  Maybe settling drunken bar bets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider this my one marketable and valuable skill.  Everything else I do in my life can easily be done by hundreds of other people, many of them better than me.  But I am much better at seeing an issue/argument from someone elses&#8217; perspective, explaining that issue/argument to them in a way that will allow it to make sense to them given their perspective, and then relating that issue/argument to other things they may not see as remotely connected.  Unfortunately, since I graduated college, I have not been able to utilize this skill in any way that is monetarily useful.  </p>
<p>I need there to be a job in which I translate people&#8217;s arguments to one another in a way that prevents what happens in most argumentative conflict which is two sides repeating what they think &#8230; like two ships passing in the night.</p>
<p>What job is that?  It&#8217;s not advertising.  That&#8217;s just sloganeering.  Probably not politics since that is often more like advertising.  Maybe settling drunken bar bets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/archives/936/comment-page-1#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/?p=936#comment-526</guid>
		<description>This concept explains why Alexander Graham Bell always gets credit for the lightbulb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This concept explains why Alexander Graham Bell always gets credit for the lightbulb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie C</title>
		<link>http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/archives/936/comment-page-1#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbellsandbacon.com/?p=936#comment-525</guid>
		<description>I love how you use lawyers as an example of those who spew forth unintelligible nonsense--thanks, Jon!  In all seriousness, though, I totally agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how you use lawyers as an example of those who spew forth unintelligible nonsense&#8211;thanks, Jon!  In all seriousness, though, I totally agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
